Supply ‘n’ Demand
AGE CONSUMDED
ETH
Polygon Watch
MATIC watch Feb.
Template_for_Research
Matic
$Matic #DAA ATH
#Polygon has made ATH in daily active addresses.
Increased Polygon onchain activity
Compares on-chain activity trends between Polygon and Ethereum, highlighting rising activity on Polygon while Ethereum assets record lower lows. Measures: On-chain activity — aggregated network usage signals across Polygon and Ethereum assets. Reflects: Network growth on Polygon versus declining activity on Ethereum. Interpretation: ↑ Polygon on-chain activity → expanding network usage and participation · ↓ Ethereum on-chain activity → reduced engagement across tracked assets Context: Commonly analyzed alongside transaction volume and Daily Active Addresses (DAA). Tags: Category: Network Metric | Signal Type: Network Activity | Market Scope: Network-level
XLM and SOL vs ETH
ETH vs. MATIC
As we have seen growing mentions how Matic could be better than ETH - it's good to check the reality based on the data. What we can see: 1. Network activity on Polygon is still far away from Ethereum, however 2. Network growth (adding new addresses) on MATIC is higher than on ETH. Sometimes (check the spikes) much higher That's important as it could mean eventually higher network activity too (subject to "the merge") 3. Behaviour of the token holders is different. - On MATIC smaller token holders are more active than on ETH - On ETH whales are dictating the price. Though there are smaller and smart enough players who are benefiting 4. General (and, imo the most stable) patterns are more clear on MATIC. We've seen it in the past on other "more beta" networks Spotting the price based on the DAA divergencies and Network growth "FOMO" is easier on MATIC